HEALTH CARE TECHNOLOGY

Two articles published in the latest NEJM issue are devoted to �our finite resources� and the inevitability of rationing care. First Dr. Howard Brody is attempting to rephrase the issue as one of �waste avoidance� and is delving into the ethics of practicing waste avoidance which is defined as withholding non-beneficial care. Of course non beneficial is not a cut and dry label, so Dr. Brody is envisioning that �[a]n ethical system for eliminating waste will include a robust appeals process�, where �[p]hysicians, as loyal patient advocates, must invoke the process when (according to their best clinical judgment) a particular patient would benefit from an intervention even if the average patient won't�. While the sentiment is commendable, I am not clear who exactly should physicians appeal to �according to their best clinical judgment� and I am not certain where the newly empowered and engaged patient go. Or is all this empowerment and engagement talk just a cruel joke? The second a...

The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010 mandates that certain administrative simplifications should be made to reduce overhead costs of health care. Since administrative complexity obeys the conservation laws of physics, for every bit of complexity that is removed, a new chunk of bureaucratic complexity must be added to the system. With that in mind, CMS has created and is proposing to grow an array of financial incentives and penalties for health care providers. This collection of carrots and sticks is intended to be used as so many levers to control and fine tune the practice of medicine by encouraging adoption of health information technology, measuring processes and steering physicians to low cost treatment methods. Since confusion is abundant, and confusion leads to anger, fear and sometimes outright panic, which in turn causes folks to dump perfectly good private practices on the first hospital that knocks on their door, I thought it would be beneficial t...

Today, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has released a Request for Information (RFI) regarding the governance of a Nationwide Health Information Network (NwHIN). The document outlines ONC�s current thinking on the subject and poses 66 questions to the public. The NwHIN is the proposed vehicle by which secure and presumably trusted health information exchange is facilitated and accelerated. The NwHIN consists, or is envisioned to eventually consist, of a set of standards and policies to govern health information exchange over the Internet. It does not include the actual infrastructure for such exchange. Below is a brief summary of the RFI highlights and the obligatory commentary on the proposed governance methodology. Highlights The 64 page document, as its title clearly states, is focused on creating trust in the exchange of health information at a National level. To that end, ONC is proposing to define a set of policies and regulations to...

Escher - Relativity, 1953 The public comments for the proposed rules for Meaningful Use Stage 2 are closing now. After reading the public submissions of several organizations, I decided not to comment, since what I wanted to say was covered by much better heeled organizations, and I am not convinced that individuals can influence government in any shape or form nowadays. Instead, I thought that this would be a good time to look back at Meaningful Use Stage 1 and see if there are any lessons to be learned, something that CMS did not deem necessary to do before moving up the escalator to Stage 2. This is a bit peculiar considering that only 5% of physicians were able to attain Meaningful Use so far, and according to a new study published in Health Affairs , less than 14% of physicians said that their EHR has all the bells and whistles necessary for Meaningful Use Stage 1. Since Meaningful Use Stage 2 is largely an amplified version of Stage 1, it may be useful to look back and identify ...